Within Nuclear UFOs

What Happened At Malmstrom In 1967?

The Malmstrom case combines a real missile failure with contested claims that unusual objects were seen nearby.

On this page

  • The confirmed Echo Flight malfunction
  • Witness claims and later affidavits
  • Why causation remains disputed
Preview for What Happened At Malmstrom In 1967?

Introduction

At Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, the central fact is not in serious doubt: on 16 March 1967, all ten Minuteman missiles assigned to Echo Flight abruptly went into “No-Go” status and lost strategic alert. The dispute is over what, if anything, was seen nearby and whether any unidentified aerial object caused the shutdown. Declassified Air Force material records the missile failure but says UFO rumours around Echo Flight were disproven; later witnesses, especially former missile officer Robert Salas, argued that unusual objects were reported near launch facilities and that the timing was too close to ignore. [documents.theblackvault.com]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

Overview image for Malmstrom That mix makes Malmstrom the hinge case in the UFOs-and-nuclear-weapons debate. It is stronger than a simple sighting story because a real nuclear missile malfunction occurred. It is weaker than a proven UFO-interference case because the public record does not show a contemporaneous official finding that a UFO was present, tracked, or causally linked to the failure. The most careful reading is therefore narrow: Malmstrom is a documented missile-readiness incident surrounded by later UFO testimony, not a publicly proven case of UFOs disabling nuclear weapons. [documents.theblackvault.com]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

The confirmed Echo Flight malfunction

Echo Flight was part of the 341st Strategic Missile Wing’s missile complex near Malmstrom. According to the declassified command-history material circulated through Freedom of Information Act releases, the incident began at 08:45 on 16 March 1967, when all launch facilities in Echo Flight shut down with “No-Go” indications. In missile terminology, “No-Go” meant the missiles were not in launch-ready condition; the important point is that the failure affected the flight almost simultaneously rather than appearing as a slow, isolated maintenance problem. [documents.theblackvault.com]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

The same record states that no other Wing I configuration lost strategic alert at that time. That detail is one reason the case has remained interesting even outside UFO circles: a ten-missile alert failure was not a routine single-site fault. It required maintenance attention and a technical investigation, and later summaries say the missiles were restored without permanent damage, roughly within a day. [Wikipedia]WikipediaMalmstrom UFO incidentMalmstrom UFO incident

The Air Force record also gives the strongest official reason for caution. It says rumours of UFOs around Echo Flight at the time of the fault were “disproven”; a Mobile Strike Team that had checked other launch facilities that morning reportedly saw no unusual activity, and the 801st Radar Squadron gave a negative report for radar or atmospheric interference related to Echo Flight. [Reddit]reddit.comLooking for official FOIA documentation regardingLooking for official FOIA documentation regarding…July 5, 2024 — "Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of…Published: July 5, 2024

Technically, the malfunction has often been discussed in terms of electrical or electromagnetic disturbance rather than physical damage. Public summaries of the engineering explanation describe an undetermined technical anomaly, with attention given to the possibility of electrical noise affecting logic couplers in the missile-control system. That does not prove a mundane cause, but it places the confirmed evidence in the category of a system fault, not an officially documented aerial intrusion. [UAP Ledger]uapledger.comUAP Ledger Malmstrom AFB Nuclear IncidentUAP LedgerMalmstrom AFB Nuclear Incident - UAP LedgerOn March 16, 1967, ten nuclear missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base went offline sim…Published: March 16, 1967

Malmstrom illustration 1

Witness claims and later affidavits

The UFO side of the Malmstrom story rests mainly on later testimony, not on a public contemporaneous Air Force conclusion. Robert Salas, a former Air Force nuclear launch officer, became the best-known witness after going public decades later. In media accounts, he described being underground when a guard reported strange lights, followed by a more alarming report of an orange or reddish pulsating object near the front gate; Salas said the missiles then began going offline. [ABC News]abcnews.comABC News Former Airmen to Govt.: Come Clean on UFOsABC NewsFormer Airmen to Govt.: Come Clean on UFOs - ABC News…

Salas’s account is often associated with an “Oscar Flight” episode around 24 March 1967 rather than the documented 16 March Echo Flight failure. That distinction matters. In popular retellings, Echo and Oscar are sometimes blended into one dramatic story of “ten missiles shut down while a UFO hovered nearby”. In the dispute itself, however, the evidential problem is sharper: Echo Flight is the best-documented missile shutdown, while Salas’s most vivid account concerns a later event whose official documentary support is much thinner. [Academia]academia.eduThe Reliability of UFO Witness TestimonyOn March 16, 1967, a UFO approached Echo Flight, one of the nuclear missile… A report…Published: March 16, 1967

The witness case broadened in 2010, when former Air Force personnel appeared at the National Press Club to argue that UFOs had interfered with nuclear weapons sites. DocumentCloud’s archive of the Malmstrom material describes affidavits from four Malmstrom-area airmen released at that press event, and contemporary news coverage reported claims by Salas and others that UFOs had disabled or affected nuclear missiles. [DocumentCloud]documentcloud.orgDocument Cloud Malmstrom UFO Testimonials | Document CloudDocument Cloud Malmstrom UFO Testimonials | Document Cloud

Those materials are important because they show that the Malmstrom UFO claim was not simply internet folklore. Named veterans made public statements, submitted affidavits, and framed the incident as a national-security matter. But affidavits and retrospective testimony do not carry the same weight as immediate radar tracks, maintenance logs explicitly recording a UFO encounter, photographs, authenticated audio, or a contemporaneous investigation concluding that an unknown object caused the fault. [DocumentCloud]documentcloud.orgDocument Cloud Malmstrom UFO Testimonials | Document CloudDocument Cloud Malmstrom UFO Testimonials | Document Cloud

Why the timing is so hard to evaluate

The case is confusing because two different evidential streams overlap imperfectly. The first stream is technical and contemporaneous: Echo Flight went down on 16 March, and the Air Force documented the failure. The second stream is testimonial and largely retrospective: unusual lights or objects were allegedly reported in the Malmstrom missile field, and some former personnel later said those sightings coincided with missile shutdowns. [documents.theblackvault.com]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

For supporters of the UFO interpretation, the key point is proximity. Malmstrom was a nuclear missile field, not an ordinary civilian setting; multiple former military personnel later described unusual aerial activity; and the missile failure was dramatic enough to demand serious attention. To them, dismissing the UFO claims as irrelevant looks too quick, especially given the Cold War context and the possibility that unusual security incidents might have been kept quiet. [press.org]press.orgOpen source on press.org.

For sceptics, the key point is separation. The strongest official document for Echo Flight records the missile fault but denies a UFO connection. Some sceptical analyses argue that later accounts conflate Echo Flight, Oscar Flight, and nearby civilian UFO reports into a single narrative that the original records do not support. Robert Sheaffer, for example, has argued that an Oscar Flight sighting may have involved a bright astronomical object, while Echo Flight was a real technical fault with no demonstrated UFO link. [badufos.blogspot.com]badufos.blogspot.comdiscovery canadas close encounters marsdiscovery canadas close encounters mars

This is why “Malmstrom” can sound like either a powerful case or a muddled one depending on which evidence is emphasised. If the reader starts with the missile logs, the UFO claim looks unsupported. If the reader starts with Salas and the later affidavits, the official record can look incomplete or evasive. The dispute is less about whether something happened at Malmstrom and more about whether the UFO testimony and the missile failure belong to the same event in a causal sense. [documents.theblackvault.com]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

Malmstrom illustration 2

The later Pentagon and AARO angle

The modern UAP era has kept Malmstrom alive because nuclear-site claims are now part of official review. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, reported in 2024 that it had interviewed former Air Force members who served around intercontinental ballistic missile sites, including Malmstrom, and that some interviewees claimed UAP sightings or disruptions to ICBM operations. AARO also stated that it could not rely on interview accounts alone for extraordinary claims, even while treating such accounts as part of its review. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF)

That 2024 report did not publicly validate the Malmstrom UFO-causation claim. It placed the nuclear-missile allegations inside a broader review of claims about UAP and sensitive programmes, while noting that some matters would remain under research. In other words, AARO acknowledged the category of allegations but did not convert them into proof that a UAP disabled missiles. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF)

In 2025, the Wall Street Journal reported a further Pentagon-linked explanation: that the famous 1967 Malmstrom shutdown had been associated with a classified electromagnetic pulse test rather than alien or unknown craft activity. Because that claim has itself been contested by UFO advocates and is not identical to the older declassified Echo Flight wording, it should be treated as a reported official-side explanation rather than a fully settled public record. [The Wall Street Journal]wsj.comufo us disinformation 45376f7eufo us disinformation 45376f7e

The significance of the newer explanation is not that it ends every debate. It shows how the case can change when classified-weapons history, nuclear command systems, and UFO narratives intersect. A classified test, if firmly documented, would explain why the event looked mysterious and why ordinary personnel might not have been told the full cause. But without a publicly released technical file tying that test directly to the Echo Flight timeline, critics can still argue that the explanation is incomplete. [The Wall Street Journal]wsj.comufo us disinformation 45376f7eufo us disinformation 45376f7e

Why causation remains disputed

The strongest evidence at Malmstrom supports three limited conclusions: a serious Echo Flight missile malfunction happened; the Air Force record did not validate UFO involvement; and later witnesses claimed unusual objects were associated with missile shutdowns at or near Malmstrom. The contested leap is causation: moving from “missiles failed” and “UFOs were later alleged” to “a UFO caused the missiles to fail”. [documents.theblackvault.com+2DocumentCloud]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

Several gaps keep that leap from being secure. There is no widely accepted public radar record showing an anomalous object over Echo Flight at the critical moment. The most official contemporaneous source says UFO rumours were disproven. The most detailed public witness accounts were developed years after the incident. And the chronology is disputed, especially around whether Salas’s account refers to Echo Flight, Oscar Flight, or a separate event later folded into the same story. [Reddit+2badufos.blogspot.com]reddit.comLooking for official FOIA documentation regardingLooking for official FOIA documentation regarding…July 5, 2024 — "Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of…Published: July 5, 2024

At the same time, the case should not be reduced to “nothing happened”. A ten-missile alert failure at a nuclear missile base is inherently significant. The later willingness of former personnel to attach their names to claims also matters historically, even if it does not prove the extraordinary conclusion. Malmstrom is therefore best handled as an evidence hierarchy: confirmed missile failure at the top, official denial of a UFO link beside it, later witness claims below that, and extraterrestrial or non-human causation as the least established layer. [UAP Ledger+2DocumentCloud]uapledger.comUAP Ledger Malmstrom AFB Nuclear IncidentUAP LedgerMalmstrom AFB Nuclear Incident - UAP LedgerOn March 16, 1967, ten nuclear missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base went offline sim…Published: March 16, 1967

The broader Air Force position after Project Blue Book also shapes the dispute. The Air Force concluded that no UFO report it investigated and evaluated indicated a national-security threat, advanced technology beyond scientific knowledge, or extraterrestrial vehicles; Project Blue Book ended with 12,618 reports collected and 701 still listed as unidentified. Those figures show why both sides can keep arguing: “unidentified” did not mean “alien”, but official closure did not erase every unresolved or poorly documented military report. [National Archives+2Air Force]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK

Malmstrom illustration 3

What Malmstrom really shows

Malmstrom remains the central nuclear-UFO case because it combines a documented strategic-weapons failure with a durable body of witness testimony. That combination is rare. Most UFO cases lack a hard technical incident; most missile failures lack a surrounding UFO narrative. Malmstrom has both, which is why it keeps returning in congressional references, UAP debates, documentaries, and sceptical reviews. [C-SPAN]c-span.orguser clip malmstrom nuclear ufo 1967user clip malmstrom nuclear ufo 1967

Its evidential value, however, depends on keeping the layers separate. The Echo Flight shutdown is evidence of a missile-system failure. Salas’s account and the affidavits are evidence that some former personnel later claimed a UFO connection. The declassified Air Force wording is evidence that the official investigation did not accept that connection. None of those pieces, by itself, proves that an unknown craft disabled nuclear missiles. [documents.theblackvault.com+2DocumentCloud]documents.theblackvault.compdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967… Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau…

The fairest conclusion is that Malmstrom is neither a clean debunk nor a clean confirmation. It is a real Cold War missile-readiness incident whose UFO layer remains unproven and disputed. For readers trying to understand UFOs and nuclear weapons, that is the lesson: the most important cases are not always the ones with the neatest answers, but the ones where documents, witnesses, secrecy, technical systems and later interpretation collide.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Happened At Malmstrom In 1967?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for UFOs

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Provides a broader evidence-focused framework for evaluating claims such as Malmstrom.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Endnotes

  1. Source: documents.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/malmstromufo.pdf
    Source snippet

    pdf14 Jun 2001 — On 16!-2rch 1967... Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during t he tiw~ of fau...

  2. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Malmstrom UFO incident
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malmstrom_UFO_incident

  3. Source: reddit.com
    Title: Looking for official FOIA documentation regarding
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1dvt3m2/looking_for_official_foia_documentation_regarding/
    Source snippet

    Looking for official FOIA documentation regarding...July 5, 2024 — "Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of...

    Published: July 5, 2024

  4. Source: academia.edu
    Link: https://www.academia.edu/101922617/The_Reliability_of_UFO_Witness_Testimony
    Source snippet

    The Reliability of UFO Witness TestimonyOn March 16, 1967, a UFO approached Echo Flight, one of the nuclear missile... A report...

    Published: March 16, 1967

  5. Source: badufos.blogspot.com
    Title: discovery canadas close encounters mars
    Link: https://badufos.blogspot.com/2014/01/discovery-canadas-close-encounters-mars.html

  6. Source: documentcloud.org
    Title: Document Cloud Malmstrom UFO Testimonials | Document Cloud
    Link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/9329-malmstrom-ufo-testimonials/

  7. Source: press.org
    Link: https://www.press.org/events/news-conferences/news-conference-unidentified-aerial-phenomenon-uap-and-nuclear-weapons

  8. Source: archives.gov
    Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

  9. Source: c-span.org
    Title: user clip malmstrom nuclear ufo 1967
    Link: https://www.c-span.org/clip/house-committee/user-clip-malmstrom-nuclear-ufo-1967/5072738

  10. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

  11. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Project Blue Book
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book

  12. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Condon Committee
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condon_Committee

  13. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Malmstrom Air Force Base
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malmstrom_Air_Force_Base

  14. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: List of reported UFO sightings
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings

  15. Source: documents.theblackvault.com
    Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/oasd.pdf

  16. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1535uo2/malmstrom_airbase_ufo_incident_witness_robert/

  17. Source: reddit.com
    Title: 1967 malmstrom afb ufo incident how do i balance
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Screenwriting/comments/1g9mlkv/1967_malmstrom_afb_ufo_incident_how_do_i_balance/

  18. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1nfbtda/captain_robert_salas_briefs_congress_member/

  19. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/fmeyld/the_unexplained_deactivated_nukes_incident_by/

  20. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/comments/1g9mjfo/967_malmstrom_afb_ufo_incident_how_do_i_balance/

  21. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1mlptfr/aaro_deputy_director_timothy_phillips_and_aaro/

  22. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1l7vau5/disinformation_is_getting_dumber_to_explain_the/

  23. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/uss48t/captain_robert_salas_ufos_shut_down_nuclear/

  24. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/comments/1qg9kho/malmstrom/

  25. Source: archive.org
    Link: https://archive.org/stream/anon_pdf_from_markdown/anon_pdf_from_markdown_djvu.txt

  26. Source: kevinrandle.blogspot.com
    Link: https://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2023/03/the-belt-montana-ufo-sighting-and.html

  27. Source: military.com
    Title: air force veterans who are ufo true believers return newly attentive washington
    Link: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/10/19/air-force-veterans-who-are-ufo-true-believers-return-newly-attentive-washington.html

  28. Source: timhebert.blogspot.com
    Title: robert hastings responds to robert
    Link: https://timhebert.blogspot.com/2014/02/robert-hastings-responds-to-robert.html

  29. Source: timhebert.blogspot.com
    Link: https://timhebert.blogspot.com/2010/11/did-ufos-disable-minuteman-missiles-at.html

  30. Source: war.gov
    Link: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/061226/release_03/documents/CIA-UAP-019-Australian_Dept_of_Defense_Scientific_and_Intel_Aspects_of_the_UFO_Problem.pdf

  31. Source: archives.gov
    Title: project blue book 50th anniversary
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary

  32. Source: abcnews.com
    Title: ABC News Former Airmen to Govt.: Come Clean on UFOs
    Link: https://abcnews.com/Technology/airmen-govt-clean-ufos/story?id=11738715
    Source snippet

    ABC NewsFormer Airmen to Govt.: Come Clean on UFOs - ABC News...

  33. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

  34. Source: uapledger.com
    Title: UAP Ledger Malmstrom AFB Nuclear Incident
    Link: https://uapledger.com/cases/malmstrom-afb-1967
    Source snippet

    UAP LedgerMalmstrom AFB Nuclear Incident - UAP LedgerOn March 16, 1967, ten nuclear missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base went offline sim...

    Published: March 16, 1967

  35. Source: wsj.com
    Title: ufo us disinformation 45376f7e
    Link: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/ufo-us-disinformation-45376f7e

  36. Source: af.mil
    Link: https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104590/unidentified-flying-objects-and-air-force-project-blue-book/

  37. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/MalmstromAirForceBase/?locale=en_GB

  38. Source: wsj.com
    Title: pentagon ufo investigation lockheed martin 1bac3d41
    Link: https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-ufo-investigation-lockheed-martin-1bac3d41

  39. Source: vault.fbi.gov
    Link: https://vault.fbi.gov/Project%20Blue%20Book%20%28UFO%29%20/Project%20Blue%20Book%20%28UFO%29%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/at_download/file

  40. Source: docs.house.gov
    Title: HHRG 118 GO12 Wstate ShellenbergerM 20241113
    Link: https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO12/20241113/117721/HHRG-118-GO12-Wstate-ShellenbergerM-20241113.pdf

  41. Source: britannica.com
    Title: Project Blue Book
    Link: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Project-Blue-Book

  42. Source: origins.osu.edu
    Title: air force investigation ufos
    Link: https://origins.osu.edu/read/air-force-investigation-ufos

Additional References

  1. Source: metabunk.org
    Link: https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/42303580-echo-flights-of-fantasy-anatomy-of-a-ufo-hoax-by-james-carlson-pdf.47230/
    Source snippet

    Echo Flights of FantasyOn page 36 of the command history obtained by Salas, it states very clearly that the. “801st Radar Squadro...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7uzLVw5HwA
    Source snippet

    Mysterious Missile Malfunction | UFOs: Investigating The Unknown | National Geographic UK...

  3. Source: youtube.com
    Title: The Malmstrom Incident | Episode 6 | When UFOs Shut Down Nuclear Missiles
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFJehKkZOVU
    Source snippet

    1967 Malmstrom Air Force Base Missile Incident w/ Robert Salas - We Are Not Alone...

  4. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meAZ_NLC7fQ
    Source snippet

    What Disabled Missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base?...

  5. Source: arxiv.org
    Link: https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06794v1

  6. Source: nsa.gov
    Link: https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/ufo/usaf_fact_sheet_95_03.pdf

  7. Source: youtube.com
    Title: What Disabled Missiles at Malmstrom Air Force Base?
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgziDyPSUog
    Source snippet

    The Malmstrom Incident | Episode 6 | When UFOs Shut Down Nuclear Missiles...

  8. Source: archivesfoundation.org
    Link: https://archivesfoundation.org/documents/50-years-ago-government-stops-investigating-ufos/

  9. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/FOX5NY/posts/a-department-of-defense-review-reveals-the-us-military-used-fake-ufo-stories-to-/1249963363159613/

  10. Source: usafaclasses.org
    Link: https://www.usafaclasses.org/1964/Salas_Robert/history.htm

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Nuclear UFOs

Related pages 36

More on this topic 6